
Towns are created by the Wisconsin Constitution to provide basic municipal government services, such as elections, property tax administration (towns collect taxes for counties, schools and other governments, as well as for their own budgets), road construction and maintenance, recycling, emergency medical services and fire protection. Some towns also offer law enforcement, solid waste collection, zoning and other services. Town governments in Wisconsin provide these general government services to 1,709,491 residents (30.1% of total state population). Ninety-five percent (95%) of the land area in Wisconsin is within towns. Towns maintain 61,996 miles of town highways.
The town form of government was brought into Wisconsin from New England in territorial days. Thus, Wisconsin towns have deep and uniquely American roots.
Legal Framework of
Towns: Towns
are "general purpose" local governments, which means that they provide basic
services used daily by all residents (Wisconsin also has "special purpose"
governments that offer more targeted services, such as school districts). The
major duties and powers of all towns are spelled out in Article IV, Section 23
of the Wisconsin Constitution,
Ch. 60 of the Wisconsin Statutes (which pertains specifically to town
governments) and
Ch. 66 of the Wisconsin Statutes (which applies to towns, villages and
cities).
Two Forms: Wisconsin
actually has two forms of general purpose local governments: a county form of 72
counties and a municipal form of some 1,851 municipalities. Wisconsin also has
three distinct types of municipalities: 1,259 towns, 402 villages and 190
cities. Counties cover the entire area of the state and are primarily
responsible for providing human services. However, there is also some overlap
with municipalities. For example, both counties and municipalities maintain
their own respective highways.
Municipalities:
In some respects, towns operate like cities and villages, but in other ways they
are quite different. They are similar in the sense that they provide many of
the same services as cities and villages, but they are organized and governed in
a different manner. The major distinguishing feature of towns is the fact that
they continue to operate as a "direct democracy." State law requires towns to
hold "town meetings" where all qualified electors who are age 18 or older and
have lived in the town for at least ten days can discuss and vote on town
matters, including the town's property tax levy. This means that the electors
of the town have more direct control over their most local government issues
than their cousins living in cities and villages (where major decisions are made
by elected representatives). Towns also tend to dove-tail their services with
counties to a greater extent than cities and villages.
Town Government: The
day-to-day administrative issues of each town are handled by an elected town
board, consisting of three or five members. Town boards are elected for
two-year terms in spring elections of odd-numbered years. Towns are also
served by a clerk and treasurer (or combined clerk-treasurer) and can have an
appointed town administrator.
Direct Democracy:
Wisconsin’s
1,259 towns are among the last vestiges of direct democracy in America (or
anyplace else). Did you know that town residents actually get to discuss and
then vote on their own municipal property tax levy every year at an annual town
budget meeting? Democracy doesn’t get much more direct than that. This unique
tradition of direct citizen involvement may help explain why towns are so good
at keeping spending and property tax levies down. It may also explain why town
residents often vigorously fight forced annexations into neighboring cities.
More About Towns:
Wisconsin has 1,259 towns, which govern all parts of the state that are not
included within the corporate boundaries of cities and villages. The terms
"town" and "township" are sometimes used interchangeably. But in Wisconsin, the
words are not identical. The word "town" denotes a unit of government while
"township" is a surveyor's term describing the basic grid framework for legal
descriptions of all land in the state (including land in cities and villages).
Originally, most towns (and townships) were six mile by six mile squares (36
square miles), but natural and man-made boundaries (rivers and county lines, for
example) caused some variation. Annexation of town lands into cities and
villages have eroded some towns to a fraction of their original size. The Town
of Germantown (Washington
County) is the smallest town in the state at 1.7 square miles.
The 1997-98 Wisconsin Blue
Book, published by the Legislative Reference Bureau, includes a
feature article about the structure of local government in Wisconsin,
including town government.
All Wisconsin towns, regardless of size, remain the most pure form of democracy
in this state.
Yet towns are sometimes cast
as the poor cousins of Wisconsin's local government family. In fact, cities and
villages do get more money and power from the state -- including the power to
annex parts of neighboring towns. The
annexation process poses obvious problems for towns, but the real damage is
the poisonous effect annexations, or the threat of annexations, have on
intergovernmental relations. Because of
Wisconsin's
archaic annexation laws, neighboring governments are involved in frequent turf
battles that undercut sound regional planning and efficient service delivery.
Another impact of the state's ongoing annexation battles is the negative picture
pro-annexation advocates sometimes paint of town government. To help promote
annexations, towns are sometimes described as inefficient, self-serving
institutions that just do not fit into the modern world. Ironically,
pro-annexation leaders even criticize towns on the grounds that they have
irregular borders -- even though these self-same borders are the result of past,
ill-considered annexations.
In this context, it is important to focus occasionally on the many reasons why
townspeople across Wisconsin
are working so hard to preserve the town form of government. Here are some of
the reasons:
Grassroots Heritage: At
a time when virtually all levels of government, from Washington to the local
school board, have become remote and bureaucratic, it is comforting to note that
1.7 million Wisconsin residents (roughly a third of the state) still live in
towns that thrive on citizen participation and direct democracy.
Towns Focus on Nuts-and-Bolts Services:
Town residents have a local government that is focused on basic
public services like road maintenance, fire protection, snow plowing, building
permits and lots of other services that people depend on every day. They know
that towns are a lot like the corner hardware store -- places where Americans
can still go to find people who are reasonable and knowledgeable, but rarely
pretentious.
Towns Remain Simple in an Age of
Complexity: Historically, towns were reliable and efficient
building blocks in the development of Wisconsin. Today, they use modern tools
to deliver public services, but they remain structurally simple and accountable,
with a town board, a handful of advisory committees and town employees. Citizens
get results because there's simply no place to hide in a town hall.
Towns Are Thrifty:
Of the $66.4 billion
in federal, state and local taxes paid by Wisconsin taxpayers in 2007, less than $350 million was levied by towns, which
means that for every $1 of taxes paid by
Wisconsin taxpayers in 2007, only about half-a-cent went to towns. Table One
shows that towns are remarkably thrifty. For example, town taxes amounted to
only $206 per capita and indebtedness was only $191 per resident. While towns
differ in key respects from cities and villages, all provide essential municipal
services (to 95% of the state’s landmass and 30% of its population in the case
of towns).
|
Table One: 2007 Per Capita Municipal Revenues, Expenditures & Debt1 |
|||
|
|
Cities |
Villages |
Towns |
|
Revenues ($ Per Resident) |
|||
|
Taxes |
575 |
567 |
206 |
|
Intergovernmental Aids |
365 |
189 |
141 |
|
Other Revenues2 |
584 |
462 |
84 |
|
Total General Revenues2 |
1,524 |
1,218 |
431 |
|
Expenditures & Debt ($ Per Resident) |
|||
|
General Administration |
138 |
126 |
71 |
|
Public Safety |
444 |
309 |
81 |
|
Sanitation/Transportation |
485 |
481 |
232 |
|
Other Expenditures3 |
644 |
426 |
79 |
|
Total General Expenditures3 |
1,711 |
1,423 |
461 |
|
General Obligation Debt |
1,224 |
1,521 |
191 |
1Columns may not sum
due to rounding; 2Excludes
long term debt & utility revenues; 3Excludes
utility operations
Source: Wisconsin Department of Revenue,
County
and Municipal Revenues and Expenditures - 2007
Towns Thrive on Volunteerism:
Part of the reason towns operate so efficiently is the huge amount of service
offered by volunteers. The Town Volunteer Fire Department is more than a proud
part of our heritage -- with modern equipment and skills, volunteers still play
a vital role in town government.
Towns Are the Last Refuge of Direct
Democracy: Long before national politicians started holding
"town meetings" towns had been meeting for generations. We still hold real town
meetings -- the kind where town residents themselves help set the agenda and
discuss issues as a community. The kind where every elector who has lived in
the town for more than 10 days is welcome. The kind where taxpayers actually
get to vote on their own property tax rate. We think that alone makes the town
form of government worth saving.
Towns Are a Good Match with Counties:
Town and county governments work together to deliver basic services
efficiently. Towns focus on local services and allow counties to deliver more
regional-scale services. Cities and villages are much more independent. Some
big cities blur the distinction between "local" and "regional" governmental
roles by trying to be both. They will even justify their efforts to annex urban
towns out of existence on the grounds that they can deliver critical public
service on a more regional (and, presumably, more efficient) scale. But if
bigger is better, then why not just shift all of these services to the county
level of government? After all, aren't counties bigger than even the largest
central cities? The point is that towns may actually offer a better
municipal/county governance model for the 21st Century than the "central city"
approach that became so popular in the last century. The town/county
relationship simply makes sense: towns focus on local services (such as
building and maintaining town roads) and counties focus on regional services
(such as building and maintaining county highways). There are some major
problems with the state laws that regulate the county/town relationship, but the
basic idea is sound. The real key to high quality, efficient services in the
future is governments working together in a coordinated and fair effort to serve
mutual constituents.
Towns may be cast as local government's black sheep by the unknowledgeable, but
their unique attributes make them worth preserving. Far from annexing towns off
the map, Wisconsin
should be idealizing and drawing strength from this simple but effective form of
government. There will always be BIG GOVERNMENT -- lets hope there will always
be small towns too.
(updated 4/16/09)
![]()
Copyright © 1998 Wisconsin Towns Association
W7686 County Road MMM | Shawano, WI 54166-6086
Phone: (715) 526-3157 | FAX: (715) 524-3917
wtastaff@wisctowns.com | webeditor@wisctowns.com