Menu Bar (Text Only Menu @ top of page

March 2006 Mailbox: Comparative Finance Data

A good book has to tell a good story and this year’s edition of “County and Municipal Revenues and Expenditures” does just that. Published last month by the Department of Revenue (DOR), it details the very different financial lives led by the three branches of Wisconsin’s municipal government family: cities, villages and towns. Using numbers rather than words it recounts their revenues, expenditures and outstanding indebtedness in 2004. Here is a Cliff-Notes version of their story.

Table 1: 2004 Municipal Revenues*, Expenditures** & Debt

 

Cities

Villages

 Towns

Total

2004 Population

3,072,334

782,161

1,678,460

5,532,955

Revenues ($000)

General Property Taxes

1,259,009

295,801

298,621

1,853,431

Other Taxes

258,779

80,948

10,749

350,476

Total Taxes

1,517,788

376,749

309,370

2,203,907

Federal Aids

106,056

8,637

4,804

119,497

State Shared Revenues

633,081

77,961

63,432

774,474

State Highway Aids

159,715

39,072

123,433

322,220

Other Aids

158,250

28,478

32,033

218,761

Total Intergovernmental Aids

1,057,102

154,148

223,703

1,434,953

Total Other Revenues

667,074

146,526

113,142

926,742

Total General Revenues

3,241,964

677,423

646,215

4,565,602

Expenditures & Debt ($000)

General Government

387,363

93,993

105,090

586,446

Public Safety

1,228,838

209,638

130,568

1,569,044

Public Works

833,475

232,633

349,213

1,415,321

Other Expenditures

1,425,114

289,308

100,072

1,814,492

Total General Expenditures

3,874,790

825,572

684,943

5,385,305

General Obligation Debt

3,474,780

1,052,712

301,642

4,829,134

Source: DOR Bulletin No. 104; “County and Municipal Revenues and Expenditures: 2004”; available online at http://www.dor.state.wi.us

*Revenues do not include proceeds of long-term debt, refunding bonds, inter-fund transfers or sale of major general fixed assets

**Expenditures do not include interfund transfers and certain refunding and tax payments

So, what’s the story? All three chapters -- revenue, expenditure and debt – tell the same story: Wisconsin’s towns are remarkably frugal. That’s not to say cities and villages don’t serve their residents well, but as the following tables show, town taxpayers enjoy basic municipal services at a fraction of the cost paid by their city and village cousins.

Table 2: Per Capita 2004 Municipal Revenues, Expenditures & Debt

 

Cities

Villages

Towns

Average

Revenues ($ Per Resident)

Total Taxes

494

482

184

398

Intergovernmental Aids

344

197

133

259

Other Revenues

217

187

67

167

Total General Revenues

1,055

866

384

824

Expenditures & Debt ($ Per Resident)

General Government

126

120

63

106

Public Safety

400

268

78

284

Public Works

271

297

208

256

Other Expenditures

464

370

60

328

Total General Expenditures

1,261

1,155

409

974

General Obligation Debt

1,131

1,346

180

873

 

Table 3: % Distribution of 2004 Municipal Revenues, Expenditures & Debt

 

Cities

Villages

 Towns

Total*

2004 Population

56%

14%

30%

100%

Revenues (% of City, Village & Town Total)

Total Taxes

69

17

14

100

Intergovernmental Aids

74

11

16

100

Other Revenues

72

16

12

100

Total General Revenues

71

15

14

100

Expenditures & Debt (% of City, Village & Town Total)

General Government

66

16

18

100

Public Safety

78

13

8

100

Public Works

59

16

25

100

Other Expenditures

79

16

6

100

Total General Expenditures

72

15

13

100

General Obligation Debt

72

22

6

100

          *Some rows may not add to 100% due to rounding

While cities, villages and towns are far from comparable in all respects, these figures allow useful general comparisons. The per capita and percentage distribution figures in Tables 2 and 3 tell a story of sometimes dramatic differences in revenues, expenditures and indebtedness. For example, Table 2 shows that total taxes in towns were less than half the level collected in cities and villages ($184 in towns vs. $494 in cities and $487 in villages) when measured in per capita terms. Table 3 shows that while towns comprise 30% of the state’s population, they levied only 14% of municipal taxes and received only 16% of intergovernmental aids. It also shows that per capita indebtedness is more than six times higher in cities than in towns. Is it any wonder that town residents place such a high value on their town government heritage?

Text Box: A skeptic may respond that town taxes and expenditure are relatively low because town residents consume a disproportionate share of county services. While it’s difficult to measure service consumption patterns, another DOR report ("Town, Village and City Taxes”) shows that town taxpayers actually pay a disproportionate share of the county tax burden due to the statutory formula that apportions county taxes to underlying municipalities. Specifically, town taxpayers paid $428 per capita in county property taxes last year, versus $241 in cities and $306 in villages (see the October 2007 Mailbox for more details).
 

 

 

 

U.S. Census Bureau Data

Wisconsin Department of Revenue Data

 Menu Bar (Text Only Menu @ top of page


Copyright © 1998 Wisconsin Towns Association
W7686 County Road MMM | Shawano, WI 54166-6086
Phone: (715) 526-3157 | FAX: (715) 524-3917
wtastaff@wisctowns.com | webeditor@wisctowns.com